Connecteu-vos amb nosaltres

EU

#Brexit: Boris Johnson va ordenar que aparegués al jutjat amb una reclamació de 350m

COMPARTIR:

publicat

on

Boris Johnson ha estat ordenat a presentar-se al jutjat sobre les reclamacions que va mentir dient que el Regne Unit va lliurar a la UE 350m £ per setmana, segons la BBC.

El candidat al lideratge conservador ha estat acusat de mala conducta a les funcions públiques després de fer la reclamació durant la campanya del referèndum de la UE de 2016.

Es tracta d’una enjudiciació privada llançada per l’executiu Marcus Ball, qui va finançar £ 200,000 per al cas.

A source close to Mr. Johnson called the case a “politically motivated attempt to reverse Brexit”.

His lawyers argued it was “a stunt”.

The preliminary hearing will take place at Westminster Magistrates’ Court and the case will then be sent to the Crown Court for trial.

anunci

The BBC’s assistant political editor, Norman Smith, said the allegations could not come at a worse time for Mr. Johnson, and his critics are likely to use the claims against him in the upcoming contest to become next Tory leader and prime minister.

The £350m figure was used by the pro-Brexit Vote Leave group throughout the referendum. It also appeared on the side of the campaign bus, which urged the UK to “fund our NHS instead”.

L'exsecretari estranger s'enfronta a tres denúncies de mala conducta a les funcions públiques, entre 21 febrer i 23 juny 2016, i entre 18 abril i 3 maig 2017.

El primer període cobreix el temps en què va fer campanya per a un vot de baixa en el referèndum de la UE, mentre que el segon cobreix la campanya de les eleccions generals d'aquest any.

Mr Ball’s lawyers lodged an application in February to summons Mr. Johnson, claiming that while an MP and mayor of London, he deliberately misled the public during the first campaign, and repeated the statement during the second.

Lewis Power QC, who represents Mr. Ball, said Mr. Johnson’s conduct had been “both irresponsible and dishonest”.

“Democracy demands responsible and honest leadership from those in public office,” he said.

‘Infamous statement’

Mr. Power said the prosecution’s application was not brought to undermine the result of the 2016 referendum and it was not about what could have been done with the saved money.

“The allegation with which this prosecution is concerned, put simply, is Mr. Johnson repeatedly misrepresented the amount that the UK sends to Europe each week,” he said.

“It is concerned with one infamous statement: ‘We send the EU £350m a week.’

“The UK has never sent, given or provided £350m a week to Europe – that statement is simply not ambiguous.”

Línia gris de presentació

Què és la mala conducta a les funcions públiques?

  • It’s an ancient offence with roots back to the 13th Century
  • It can only be brought against someone who is exercising some kind of official function – such as a civil servant, a prison officer or someone else entrusted to carry out a public role
  • Someone is guilty of the offence if a prosecution can prove that the official wilfully neglected to perform their duty – or “misconducts” themselves – to such a degree that it amounts to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder
  • La infracció pot conduir a la cadena perpètua
Línia gris de presentació

The source close to Mr. Johnson said the decision to summon him was “extraordinary” and “risks undermining our democracy”.

“It is not the role of criminal law to regulate political speech,” they said.

“If this case is allowed to proceed then the state, rather than the public, will be put in charge of determining the strength of arguments at elections.”

The private prosecution was also criticized by Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg, who said it was “fundamentally ill-judged and improper”.

“It is a grave error to try and use legal process to settle political questions,” he told the BBC.

“The issue at hand is whether it was right to use the gross or net level of our contribution to the European Union – that is a matter of free speech and the democratic process.”

But in her written ruling, District Judge Margot Coleman said: “The applicant’s case is there is ample evidence that the proposed defendant knew that the statements were false.”

She continued: “I accept that the public offices held by Mr. Johnson provide status, but with that status comes influence and authority.”

Va afegir que hi havia proves suficients d’un problema per continuar amb un judici, tot i que va destacar que les denúncies actualment no van ser provades.

Línia gris de presentació

Com funciona una fiscalitat privada?

Anyone can bring a private prosecution – for example, the RSPCA pursue animal cruelty cases all the time.

Però el director de fiscals, Max Hill, QC, té el poder de fer-se càrrec d'un cas o aturar-lo en les seves pistes.

He can therefore authorize the Crown Prosecution Service to take over Mr. Johnson’s case if the allegations made by Mr. Ball pass the CPS’ own evidence test, there is a public interest in doing so, or there is a particular need to get involved.

The DPP can stop a private prosecution if he concludes it’s vexatious, malicious or flawed for a range of other reasons.

Given the district judge has already declared there is a prima facie case to be tested, the DPP may decide there’s nothing he can usefully add and stay well clear.

So Mr. Johnson’s lawyers may already be looking at how to challenge the decision’s lawfulness. And that could mean the case – like many other private prosecutions – becomes mired in legal argument and appeals.

Comparteix aquest article:

EU Reporter publica articles de diverses fonts externes que expressen una àmplia gamma de punts de vista. Les posicions preses en aquests articles no són necessàriament les d'EU Reporter.

Tendències